Explain the constitutionality of the electoral bond and recent landmark judgment

The Government Adopted The Electoral Bond Scheme In The 2017 Finance Bill, Which Went Into Effect In 2018. This Strategy Involves Issuing Electoral Bonds, Which Are Instruments Or Securities Used To Donate Funding To Political Parties. These Bonds Are Similar To Bearer Bonds Or Promissory Notes In That The Custodian (Bank) Pays The Bondholder (Political Party).

Because Electoral Bonds Are Bearer Instruments, No Ownership Information Is Recorded, And The Holder Is Considered To Be The Owner, The Name And Other Data Or Information Of The Donor Are Not Recorded On The Instrument, Making Electoral Bonds Anonymous.

An Electoral Bond Is A Financial Method For Donating To Political Parties. The General Public May Also Issue Electoral Bonds To Fund Eligible Political Parties. To Receive Electoral Bonds, A Political Party Qualified To Undertake Campaigns Must First Register Under Section 29a Of The Representation Of The People Act Of 1951.

Electoral Bonds, Like Banknotes, Are Receivable To The Bearer Without Interest Or Demand. Individuals Can Purchase These Bonds Digitally, With A Dd Or A Cheque.

Explain the constitutionality of the electoral bond and recent landmark judgment
Constitutionality Of The Electoral Bond

The Supreme Court's Five-Judge Constitution Bench Unanimously Ruled That The Centre's Electoral Bond Scheme, Which Allows For Anonymous Political Payments, Is Unconstitutional. It Stressed That The Plan Infringes On The Right To Information Guaranteed By Article 19(1)(A) Of The Constitution. The Court also Overturned Modifications To The Income Tax Act Of 1961 And The Representation Of The People Act Of 1951 That Allowed For Anonymous Political Contributions.

  • Violation Of The Right To Information Under Article 19(1)(A) Of The Constitution: The Court Ruled That The Program, Which Allowed Anonymous Political Donations, Violated Article 19(1)(A) Of The Constitution. It Stated That Such A Right Is Not Just Limited To Ensuring Freedom Of Speech And Expression, But Also Plays An Important Role In Advancing Participatory Democracy By making the Government Accountable. As A Result, It Is More Than A Means To An End; It Is An End In Itself. It Emphasized That Economic Inequality Results In Varying Levels Of Political Engagement Due To The Close Relationship Between Money And Politics. As A Result, There Is A Legitimate Risk That A Financial Contribution To A Political Party Will Result In Quid Pro Quo Arrangements.

  • Not Proportionally Justifiable To Limit Black Money In Electoral Finance: The Court Rejected The Government's Contention That The Plan Reduces Illicit Money And Its Circulation, Stating That It Does Not Justify The Infringement On Fundamental Rights. Using The Proportionality Test Established In Its 2017 Decision In The Ks Puttaswamy Case, Which Maintained The Right To Privacy, It Highlighted That The Government Did Not Choose The Least Restrictive Approach To Achieve Its Goal. The Court Also Agreed With The Petitioners' Argument That Because The Objective Of Combating Black Money Cannot Be Traced Back To Any Of The Reasonable Restrictions Outlined In Article 19(2), It Cannot Be Considered A Legitimate Justification For Restricting The Fundamental Right To Information.

  • The Amendment To Section 29c Of The Representation Of The People Act Was Quashed: Initially, Section 29c Of The Representation Of The People Act, 1951, Required Parties To Record Any Contributions Over ₹20,000, Specifying Whether They Came From Individuals Or Companies. However, The Finance Act Of 2017 Revised This Section To Make It Clear That Such A Requirement Does Not Apply To Donations Made Using Electoral Bonds. The Court Ruled That The Original Requirement To Disclose Contributions Over ₹20,000 Effectively Balanced Voters' Right To Information With Donors' Right To Privacy, As Donations Below This Threshold Were Less Likely To Influence Political Decisions.

 Directions Were Issued

  • The SBI has Been Instructed To Immediately Halt The Issuance Of Any Additional Electoral Bonds And To Provide The ECI with Details Of Such Bonds Purchased By Political Parties Since April 12, 2019, By March 6. Such Information Must Contain The Date Of Purchase, The Name Of The Purchaser, And The Denomination Of The Bond Purchased

  • By March 13, 2024, The ECI will Publish All Of The Information Given By The SBI on Its Official Website.

  • Electoral Bonds That Are Still Valid For Fifteen Days But Have Not Yet Been Encashed By The Political Party Must Be Returned, After Which The Issuing Bank Will Reimburse The Amount To The Purchaser's Account.

  • On February 15, The Supreme Court Ruled That The Center's Electoral Bond Scheme, Which Allows For Anonymous Political Donations, Was Illegal.

  • It Stressed That The Plan Infringes On The Right To Information Guaranteed By Article 19(1) (A) Of The Constitution.

  • The Court also Overturned Modifications To The Income Tax Act And The Representation Of People Act That Permitted Such Anonymous Political Contributions.

Lead India Offers Various Legal Services, Such As Free Legal Advice And Internet Information. We Offer A Platform Where You Can Speak With A Lawyer And Ask Legal Questions. Lead India's Lawyers Can Assist You With Any Legal Issues. In India, Lead India Provides Free Legal Assistance Online. In Addition To Providing Legal Advice Online, Lead India Allows Users To Ask Professionals Questions For Free. 

 Source:-

Visit us: — www.leadindia.law

Call Us: +91–8800788535

Email: care@leadindia.law

YouTube: — https://www.youtube.com/c/LeadIndiaLawAssociates

Facebook: — https://www.facebook.com/leadindialaw

LinkedIn: — https://www.linkedin.com/company/76353439

Twitter: — https://twitter.com/leadindialaw

Pinterest: — https://in.pinterest.com/lawleadindia

Instagram: - https://www.instagram.com/leadindialawofficial
Location: Kanchanjunga Building, Kanchanjunga Building, Barakhamba Rd, Fire Brigade Lane, Barakhamba, New Delhi, Delhi 110001, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How To Sell Property Which Is Captured By A Criminal?

Image
India Is A Country Where Natural Resources Such As Land, Etc. Are Worshipped. An Ordinary Man Here For His Whole Life,  Invests His Blood And Flesh To Own A Piece Of Land For His Family. And If One Day Someone Else Misappropriated Such  Property, Then The Rightful Owner Has No Proof Of Ownership Of The Same. A Land Could Have A Variety Of Definitions, As  It May Be An Indicator Of National Development For The State Or  A Profitable Asset For The Corporations. Sometimes, It Could Be Greed Leading To Unlawful Entitlement Or Unauthorized Possession Of Land, Hence Violating The Rights Of The Lawful Owners. In Case You Have Questions Related To The Issue Of Land Grabbing And Why It Should Be A Matter Of Concern Or If You Wish To Sell A Property Illegally Possessed By A Person Of Criminal Background, You Can Contact An Experienced Property Lawyer In Mumbai . Land Grabbing And Why Is It A Matter Of Concern? An Act Or Attempt To Acquire Or Occupy Such Land Or Property Which Belongs T
Read more

What Are The Legal Implications Of Selling Spoiled Or Non-Vegetarian Food Online?

Image
It is the responsibility of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (Fssai) to set scientifically based guidelines for food items and Control their production, storage, sale, and import. Thus, In Order To Govern The Food Sector, Several Penalties And Punishments Are Prescribed By The Fssai Act For Any Violations. What Are Food Safety Violations? Food Safety Rules Apply In Every State With The Goal Of Protecting Consumers From Food Poisoning And Other Food-Borne Illnesses. Food Producers, Wholesalers, And Restaurants Are Subject To Strict Regulations Regarding How They Serve Food To Customers. Food Safety Regulations, For Instance, Specify That Tainted, Damaged, Or Expired Food Must Never Be Served To Consumers. Furthermore, A Lot Of The Nearby Counties Also Conduct Routine Inspections Of Eateries And Other Establishments That Sell Food. The Goal Of These Inspections Is To Make Sure That Food Safety Regulations Are Being Followed By These Eateries And Enterprises That S
Read more

What is the success rate of SLPs in the Supreme Court?

Image
This Is Not An Appeal, But A Petition Was Filed For An Appeal. After The SLP is Filed, The Supreme Court Will Review The Case, Grant "Leave" If It Thinks It is Appropriate, And Then The Petition Will Be Turned Into An Appeal. Next, The SLP will Become An Appeal, And The Court Will Have The Opportunity To Hear The Case And Render A Decision In Light Of It. Success Rate: A Special Leave Petition (SLP) Argued By A Senior Advocate Has Approximately Twice The Likelihood Of Being Heard By The Supreme Court Than Cases Without A Senior Advocate, According To Research. According To The Numbers Provided By The Top Court, There Were Approximately 71,000 Cases Submitted For Admission To The Supreme Court In 2014, Of Which Approximately Half (34,500) Were Slp About Civil Cases. Therefore, The Apparent Shift In Favor Of The Petitioner Is Quite Significant. In Essence, An SLP filed Under Article 136 Of The Constitution Asks The Court To Use Its Discretionary Powers To Hear An Appeal Agains
Read more